Wildlife_habitat

30:57 Also, we the people also do not want any communications in Clark County that comply to a big government during the next pandemic, as Mr. Medvedji mentioned years ago, and or during a lockdown attempt. You must at that time serve the people and our will if government tries to rule over the people. And so I do have some concerns about the wetlands. I saw the map, it's quite a large area that they're going to be taking over. And it says it leads it to where it looks like it might. They're gonna try to avoid or minimize in some wetlands located within and near the right away of this property. So I have great concerns for that. We can't touch any wetlands anymore.

31:54 And you take a little here, you take a little there before you know it. We don't have any more wetlands. And that's how it goes. And we all know that that's what the government does. So we want to make sure that we do not touch those wetlands, which brings me to the 5.1 hazardous substances. I mean, I'm not sure about what's gonna be a hazardous substance there. But as it reads here, but since you didn't have any discussion with this council, they might not have read this, that there is a possible waste or pollutants or contamination into this right of way, or the county property that's there, which is a public hazard to the people that will be around there. Again, if memory serves me right, I don't have the map. I'm thinking it's somewhere there in the Forest Plain Commons area,

32:50 if I'm not mistaken, but it's a big area where there's a lot of people. So we wanna make sure there's no hazardous substances at all. And we wanna not touch those wetlands. In fact, build some better wetland there if there's wetlands there. And make it more presentable for the frogs and the bees and the bugs.