Building_development

1:41:12 not required. And there's an exhibit should be 10 or 11. I'll just be, uh, revise that statement in the staff report when I write my findings. Um, Miss Whitaker, since you're here, the VIIRS subdivision proposed improvements to 174th and 50th turn lane. I don't but I don't know some kind of improvements and was also the staff noted that H C's H C Z. I'm not sure about that conservation. Something may be required for those improvements. I am this applicants required to make those same improvements if VIIRS doesn't do it first. So I'm assuming they would also have to get it. They have to consider whether an H C Z is required or determine. Is that correct? So, um, the

1:42:07 H C Z means habitat conservation zone is associated with the stream. And so the VIIRS subdivision. This was a complicated one because the VIIRS subdivision is to the east of this. They share the eastern boundary, or it's to the east of this one. And so there's two wetlands that cross the boundaries on either side. So VIIRS had already had approval to fill a couple of the wetlands. These are really small wetlands, by the way. Yeah, I think we're talking about different issues here. I just want to clarify. I'm familiar with what you're talking about with the wetlands that makes it onto the side that VIIRS is filling. But VIIRS is also the VIIRS applicant also proposed to construct certain improvements, 174th and 50th at that intersection, some kind of a turn lane improvement. And as I had to go back and

1:43:06 look at that decision for something else, and I just happened to notice that the I think the condition there was something about that may require an H C permit, or I may have gotten the initials wrong, because improvements to that intersection to build that turn lane may impact a stream or whatever. Yeah, that project was having to do with a final wetland or habitat permit due to