The hearing addressed two development applications, starting with a continuance request for the Hartwood North subdivision to await a potential county ordinance correcting a glitch in the concurrency code for road volume capacities. The discussion then covered the 58th Avenue subdivision, detailing a proposal to divide a 0.79-acre lot in an R1-6 zoning district into 12 single-family attached townhomes. This proposed development involves demolishing an existing residence and garage to construct three townhome buildings, a private access road, and new sidewalks connecting to an adjacent public park.
Building_development
Clark County Land Use Hearings · Jun 11, 2026 · 0:37–1:15 · Watch on CVTV ↗
Keywords: zoning concurrency subdivision
What was said
0:00 Okay. Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the June 11th, 2026 hearing of the Clark County Land Use Hearings Examiner. My name is Daniel Cairns, appearing remotely from British Columbia. I'll be the examiner presiding over tonight's hearing. And it consists of two agenda items. First up, 58th Avenue subdivision as PLD-2026-8. And secondly, the Hartwood North subdivision PLD-2025-114. And we have a procedural announcement about the heartland that I will get
0:59 to when I'm done with my introductory remarks, in which I describe, introduce you to me and describe how the process is going to work tonight. First of all, I and one other, I think we have just one other hearings examiner. We serve by appointment by the Board of County Counselors to review land use applications for unincorporated Clark County. We are independent land use lawyers. We are not county employees. We are not staff. We are independent. We provide an unbiased, independent evaluation of these proposals. And to do that, we review the application, all the materials associated with it, and in support of it, the staff report and all the various staff and state agency comments, and then also all of the public comments on each of these applications, because
1:54 they were publicly noticed and posted and oftentimes generate a good deal of local concern. So once we review all these, we review also the local code criteria. Those are the standards that control the outcome of each of these items. Those are the standards that were in the county's unified development code on the day each one of these applications was submitted. And that freezes
Evidence (1 match)
direct keyword 0:37–1:15 zoning, concurrency, subdivision
aminer. My name is Daniel Cairns, appearing remotely from British Columbia. I'll be the examiner presiding over tonight's hearing. And it consists of two agenda items. First up, 58th Avenue subdivision as PLD-2026-8. And secondly, the Hartwood North subdivision PLD-2025-114. And we have a procedural announcement about the heartland that I will get to when I'm done with my introductory remarks, in which I describe, introduce you to me and describe how the process is going to work tonight. First o