← Discussions

Building_development

Clark County Land Use Hearings · Jun 25, 2026 · 35:13–35:38 · Watch on CVTV ↗

The hearing focused on the proposed Glowstone Ridge subdivision, which seeks preliminary plat approval to build 25 single-family lots on 4.78 acres in an R-16 zoning district. Much of the discussion centered on transportation concurrency, with officials confirming that the applicant's traffic study met the required volume-to-capacity ratios for regional corridors. Additionally, neighbors raised concerns about emergency vehicle access and construction disruptions, leading the applicant to commit to installing perimeter fencing to prevent the new traffic from accessing adjacent private roads.

Keywords: subdivision plat zoning concurrency

What was said

34:12 Is there any opportunity to push that back a little further, like say 10 feet? And the reason I say that is sometimes when we have, since it's a one lane road, when we have traffic going each direction, we do use that field occasionally for cars to go by each other. So two feet really wouldn't do us a whole lot of good. It'd be great if we could look at somewhere around 10 feet, if possible. The other thing is, unless there's an easement on this site for that purpose, no, I can't require that. The applicant's allowed to develop their property to the extent of the property. Understand that if there's an easement, that's another issue. So I'll ask the applicant to address that issue. Okay. And they were talking about fencing, the six foot cedar fence.

35:09 There is a six foot cedar fence, Melissa, I'm sure you saw it. When you're on 187th, it's on the east side of 187th, just north of the proposed subdivision. Something like that fencing would be wonderful. We would propose that it not only goes along northeast 185th, but also down northeast 23rd. So it would be consistent and not let each individual homeowner put up whatever kind of fence that they want to put up in their backyards. We would also like to ask, well, it's been stated that we do not wish for having any construction vehicles coming down our private road during this process. So I understand that there's a fence going to go up once everything is done.

36:04 And we would also request that there would not be any type of gate put in there. So we could have pedestrians and people walking over towards our property. So that fence would be, you know, solid, that would be one request. The other thing would be what could be put up since we're going to be facing all of the construction from our house here, what could be put up during construction that could help with sound, dirt, dust flying all over the place? Is there anything that is required?


Evidence (1 match)

direct keyword 35:13–35:38 subdivision, plat, zoning, concurrency
the applicant to address that issue. Okay. And they were talking about fencing, the six foot cedar fence. There is a six foot cedar fence, Melissa, I'm sure you saw it. When you're on 187th, it's on the east side of 187th, just north of the proposed subdivision. Something like that fencing would be wonderful. We would propose that it not only goes along northeast 185th, but also down northeast 23rd. So it would be consistent and not let each individual homeowner put up whatever kind of fence tha

Full match → · CVTV ↗