During a public hearing for a proposed residential development, neighboring residents provided public testimony expressing concerns over increased traffic, emergency vehicle access, construction impacts, and confusing street names. Several commenters specifically questioned the accuracy of the applicant's traffic study, alleging it was conducted during a local school strike. In response to these public comments, the Hearing Examiner clarified code requirements and announced that the record would remain open for an additional week to accept further written testimony and evidence from the community.
Cross_cutting
Clark County Land Use Hearings · Jun 25, 2026 · 1:06:19–1:06:42 · Watch on CVTV ↗
Keywords: public hearing public comment public testimony
What was said
1:05:16 accounts to make sure that they did this during active school and not with that strike that is not true so that is our i can't take any testimony from the the public at this point i will hold the record open if anybody wants to just provide evidence to dispute that you're welcome to but at this point i'll ask everybody to mute themselves go ahead mr taylor and we talked about the two-foot setbacks you know from the property line there will be construction fencing put up erosion control fencing but no additional fencing is proposed or required during construction and then following construction you'll have the privacy fencing so i believe that covers most of the questions and discussion the camera put on my list here
1:06:10 yep i believe we've covered it also any other questions from you mr examiner i'm i'm gonna hope i have to hold the record up for a week for public additional public testimony do you want an additional week for final argument if you to respond if you and then if you wanted to waive that at the end you can correct yeah we would uh elect to keep that week for responses if necessary okay so with that i'm going to close the hearing let me grab my calendar i'm going to hold the record open as we just discussed for one week until july 2nd for anybody to submit additional testimony and evidence on any issues i will hold it open and for an additional week for the applicant alone to submit a final written argument without
1:07:05 any new evidence until july 9th anything anybody wants to submit has to be physically received by the county by 5 p.m on july 2nd for the public july 9th for the applicant's final argument if the applicant wants they can either waive the final argument or submit it early and i'll close it when i receive the final argument i will issue try and get my decision out no later than july 23rd i will send my decision to the county the county will send it to parties of record so anybody who has testified orally or in writing or who does so during the following week open record period will be sure and receive a copy
Evidence (1 match)
cross_cutting keyword 1:06:19–1:06:42 public hearing, public comment, public testimony
o i believe that covers most of the questions and discussion the camera put on my list here yep i believe we've covered it also any other questions from you mr examiner i'm i'm gonna hope i have to hold the record up for a week for public additional public testimony do you want an additional week for final argument if you to respond if you and then if you wanted to waive that at the end you can correct yeah we would uh elect to keep that week for responses if necessary okay so with that i'm goin