Cross_cutting

1:15:37 So that's what I was saying earlier that we preferred the cities because you wouldn't want, unless you want to use a policy approach where you want to direct growth to some, say for a city, if the impact fee is much lower. Developers can take advantage of that, but that's not what we are often preferred. We want the fees to be consistent. - Any other questions for staff or Leon? Any, well, before that, do we have anybody online? - Just to quickly run through the instructions again. Those who have joined remotely via computer or phone, please raise your virtual hand or press star for you on your phone to let us know if you'd like to provide comment.

1:16:33 Nobody online and still nobody in the hearing room who'd like to provide comment, so that does conclude public comment for this agenda item. - Okay, bringing it back, hearing none, we'll bring it back to the commissioners. Any discussion and/or a motion and a second? - As commissioner, I think just for discussion purposes, my concern is the jump in fees, especially with the multifamily. In a place that needs housing and that will not be able to command high rents, that can create some real barriers to housing, and I think that's something to really think about.

1:17:25 - Any other questions or comments? - This is Commissioner Barka. So, Jack, going back to your statement, are you saying that you consider this too large? - Yeah, I would keep it as is, just because that is not a market that can absorb really high costs. If I'm in downtown Vancouver, I can absorb pretty high costs,