Cross_cutting

19:08 that will be located in Tract A. The partial fill will require about 6.051 wetland credits to be purchased from the Columbia River Medigation Bank. The critical area and bank use memo have also been reviewed by the Clark County Wetland Biologist as a third-party reviewer, and they concur with the findings found in the report. And regarding the Oregon white oak, the applicant submitted a memo with findings regarding this on our... We had a historic mapping that showed an Oregon white oak. From this memo, they found out that there's evidence that indicates that the Oregon white oak naturally fell from the adjacent Eastern parcel with the upper portion extending onto the property, not providing habitat value within the wetland that will be protected. Next slide. We did hold a notice of application

20:07 and public comment period. The comment period was held from April 30th to June 1st. Public comments are included with the staff for as exhibit P. We received four public comments during this period. Some common topics that were brought up were residential density, compatibility, traffic safety in critical areas, as well as stormwater concerns. The applicant is proposing attached single family dwellings and one detached single family homes, which is allowed in the R22 zoning. The zoning also allows smaller lights, lot sizes as small as 1500 square feet. This project has been reviewed by city's transportation and stormwater departments and was deemed that the project can meet their requirements as conditioned. Here's another aerial showing the zoning. It's surrounded by R22 on the North and East side. To the South of the property, it's separated by Highway 14

21:05 and we have R4 zoning located on the other side. To the West, it's also separated by street and it has R9 zoning on the other side. And we've gone over these applicable code sections listed here already. So staff is reviewing this for subdivision approval. The approval process for this is a Type 3 subdivision, which is required for 10 lots or more. It was reviewed against the preliminary approval criteria and subdivision technical standards. And like Jason mentioned earlier, the city is in agreement with a revision of condition number four and the removal condition number seven, eight, 13 and 14. And staff recommends approval of the subdivision as condition in the staff report with those revisions. Right, I'll stop sharing.

22:04 - Okay, thank you, Ms. Sanchez. And I appreciate both you and Mr. Taylor addressing the revision of condition four and the removal of those other four conditions. So thank you for that. Again, I don't have any questions at this time, but I may have some after public testimony, so thank you. Okay, all right, now is the time for public testimony. Again, I will be swearing you in because testimony will be provided under oath. I ask that you limit your comments to three minutes. One additional request I have is that if you have submitted a written public comment, you do not need to read from that because I will be reviewing all the comments that are already in the record. So with that, who would like to provide public testimony?

23:02 Please use the raise hand button and we will call on you. I'm not seeing any raised hands at this time. - I'm not seeing any raised hands either, examiner Marshall. - Okay. - Oh, nope. - Here we have. - Yes, Rosalind. - Rosalind, Rosalind, good evening. Thank you for raising your hand. I'm happy to swear you in. And if you've got some comments you'd like to make on this application. Oh, hello, good evening. All right, please raise your hand. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? - Yes.