Building_development

33:19 private access way, you know, shared with adjacent parcels. It's done all the time with mixed use projects. So once again, I went ahead and labeled all the parcels within the 600-foot radius. So we have lot A, B, C, D, E, F, G, I, J, K, L, L, N, O, P. So I looked at every single one of them. They happen to have the same zoning as us, as R16, which the maximum density is 7.9. And since parcel B, C, J, L, N, O, net zero, I mean, these parcels are too small. So for example, let's take lot five. Five can only be a one-lot shore plat. So there is no one-lot shore plat. So this is our project

34:15 here in pink. So if they were to extend the public or even private road, it would actually stop here because B is only a one-lot shore plat. C could be a two-lot shore plat, but if you're to put a 40-foot width road through there and now it would only be a one-lot shore plat. So there is no way that the road can go any further to the west. Now, if we go to the east, J and K and L can only be a two-lot shore plat, but if you put a 40-foot road through there, then it'd only be a one-lot shore plat and the county doesn't have a one-lot shore plat. So there is no feasible way. So once again, the circulation, once a circulation road or route, this would be 100 or no less than 100. This would be less than the 100

35:10 and no greater than 800. So this would meet the dimensional standards and be less than 3,200, but B, C, and A cannot redevelop it by putting a road through there, either private or public. And going east, same thing. This would be circulation, would meet circulation. This is the only one that would actually meet access spacing through here. We're not meeting access spacing because you can see the public roads to the south, and this is an arterial. So none of these parcels to the west can meet access spacing, even if A was even remotely