Building_development

51:27 Okay. The other is he did show a potential couple of potential connections back to 40th through the adjacent property, but his argument is that it's not, um, the County wouldn't be able to require a, such a road connection because the part, some of those parcels are so small that it wouldn't be proportional to the County would be precluded from requiring the public road. So it would never connect basically arguing that Burton case. I'll just say that. Yeah. I mean, in my experience, I haven't looked at making assumptions about what the ADT could be. Uh, I think that the applicant did and the applicant has in other cross circulation conversations to say, this is my speculation on what could happen. Um,

52:26 there's a new comprehensive plan that's going to be released later this year that could change the zoning. So any analysis by the County or by the applicant would be a presumption based on what's available today. Uh, so that's definitely something that you could request Mr. Henry's examiner, but historically I haven't worked on a project where I've gone and made assumptions about the product and the ADT for the neighbor to figure out where the proportionality lies, stops begins. Okay. Um, not to make the applicant's argument, but, but he just to expand on my question, then somebody has to, he's arguing that somebody has to show that it's feasible to provide those connections and he's arguing it's not. Um, and I'm sorry,

53:24 if you can respond to that issue during the open record, I'd appreciate it. Yes, sir. Um, Mr. Williams, do you want to respond? Yeah. So it wasn't, it wasn't a speculation. It's just taking the lot area and divided by maximum density. We have no choice, but to use the base zone, what current zone is, because once again, we're looking at a feasibility for today, not necessarily the future, but like I said, some of them are, are pretty darn