Building_development

1:09:35 a second reason why I mentioned that I was out of the office for a couple of weeks because when I finished my review, we had only had one comment letter and that's what I mentioned in the staff report. Obviously many, many more have come in. You can, you can see exhibits 35 through 44, 48 through 56. I think there were even some earlier than that 32. There, there are lots, we have lots of neighborhood comments. So I just wanted to, uh, acknowledge that that even though I had only listed one, a comment letter when I, when I had written the staff report, um, obviously a lot more has come in since, since then. And so I would just want it to, uh, acknowledge that. Okay. So, um, based upon the staff report and recommendation, uh, which was exhibit, as I said, I met made exhibit 62 and our onsite transportation and

1:10:30 stormwater comments and staff report, which is exhibit 58. Uh, we do recommend approval of the subdivision proposed subdivision, um, based upon those conditions that are in both of those exhibits. And that concludes my presentation. Of course I understand you may have some further followup questions. Okay. Um, sorry, I can't read my own writing here. I think that did a couple of questions for the applicants. I'll skip those for now on page nine of your staff report, um, uh, finding 12 under habitat impacts. So, uh, this is from Mr. Watt. Um, it says their temporary habitat impacts under certain of the Oak trees for trenching. And,

1:11:30 um, but if, if, if you, if they're trenching and it cuts the root, isn't that a permanent impact? I'm not sure how that's a temporary impact and Mr. Watt, if you can respond to that question, Mr. Watt, we're not hearing you. I think you're muted, Mr. Watt. We're not hearing you. Let's try that. There we go. There we go. Okay. I don't know what happened.