← Discussions

Building_development

Clark County Land Use Hearings · Jul 23, 2026 · 1:36:34–1:37:00 · Watch on CVTV ↗

No summary yet — run council-monitor summarize.

Keywords: concurrency infrastructure subdivision comprehensive plan plat density zoning traffic impact

What was said

1:35:29 I can address, um, some of those items. Um, the, so, so the, there's the parcel to the, that's part of the South East corner of the site. Um, that, that parcel was included with this application. Um, I, I have not had direct communication with that property owner. The, um, the applicant was the one that was working with that property owner and they, um, they signed the application for, for this proposal, um, where, where they're included within this, this application. Um, so I'm not sure what. Yeah. You can read you the letter and respond during the open record. Yeah. So the, yeah, the, the development doesn't affect the parcel.

1:36:28 Um, you know, there, there are a lot, there's an extra lot that's proposed that is intended to, to go to that property owner as well. Um, so the subdivision is not removing land from, from that property owner, but that, that property owner in the end will, will gain, gain an additional tax parcel, um, which is, um, yeah, they, their property would increase and it would include law 13 and 14. Um, but that's, I mean, that's entirely a private agreement and, um, we can, you know, the applicant can, can work with the property owner to further clarify any, any issues that are going on there. Um, regarding, um, bald eagles, um, that that is news to me. I have not seen any, any evidence. Um, I have not seen the public

1:37:24 comment to see if there is any evidence in the record of, of that. So I don't have any information to, to provide there. Um, regarding the 25th frontage, it is 25th avenue is a narrow, um, half width road. Currently, um, they built an attached sidewalk on the Eastern side 20 foot road, and they have curb on the Western end of that. Now the, the issue, um, from the development issue, from our perspective, uh, you know, we, we're required to provide applicable, um, half width improvements to that road. Um, that road was built in close


Evidence (1 match)

direct keyword 1:36:34–1:37:00 concurrency, infrastructure, subdivision, comprehensive plan, plat, density, zoning, traffic impact
and respond during the open record. Yeah. So the, yeah, the, the development doesn't affect the parcel. Um, you know, there, there are a lot, there's an extra lot that's proposed that is intended to, to go to that property owner as well. Um, so the subdivision is not removing land from, from that property owner, but that, that property owner in the end will, will gain, gain an additional tax parcel, um, which is, um, yeah, they, their property would increase and it would include law 13 and 14.

Full match → · CVTV ↗