Wildlife_habitat

2:22:12 that's all there is from, from land use. There was a lot of engineering stuff and the bald eagle stuff. I'm pretty sure somewhere in one of the exhibits, I saw Lance discuss the bald eagle issue. And, but... I thought so too, that they are no longer listed as endangered or threatened. So they are, they remain subject to the federal law about bald and golden eagles. Don't quote me on that one. So if there are eagles present, the applicant has to comply with federal law, but the fact that they're there, they may be using the site doesn't preclude this development unless that somehow conflicts with federal law regarding protection of bald and golden eagles. But it may be, it's not something I have any jurisdiction over. The applicant

2:23:06 has to comply with federal law and the feds can come, if they violated, the feds can pursue that. That's all from land use staff. I'm not sure if your engineering or habitat staff has anything further, but that's it from land use. Any, any anybody else? And if you have nothing to say, can you chime in and say, no, I have nothing to say. This is Alistair Dawson with development engineering. I was looking at the road modification, is that 57? Yes, 57. And the page five in reference is a copy and paste from the applicant's narrative, but I believe it's just, I mean, Jason and PLS can comment in the open record if they want. It's probably just a transposing east versus west. Their improvements are on the west side

2:24:01 of 25th Avenue. So I think it's just a typo. Yeah, it, well, it says the proposed roadway meets County code, the applicants utilizing the flex zone to add sidewalk and a planner strip on the east side. I think that is Midwest. Yeah, I think you're right too, because they, they don't have the right to the east side because that's private property. Yeah. And then Mr. Hearns examiner, you and I already talked about the access on 25th versus 144th. So I wasn't going to say anything else in regards to that. I think that was most of the public comment that DE could have responded to. So if you don't have any follow up on that, I don't have anything further. I don't. Thank you, Mr. Dawson. Thank you.

2:24:54 I'll unmute myself to Lancelot Clark County wetland habitat. I don't have any other issues either just on the bald eagles. Yes, it is a federal law is not made, but regulated by the fish and wildlife. So. Okay. Thank you, Mr. Watt. Mr. Taylor, any response from the applicant? Yes, there were a lot of issues brought up and I'll do my best to address the issues that I, that I can. I, so I have been skimming exhibit 5758, which is the road mod approval

2:25:52 and the engineering conditions. It doesn't look like there are any surprises there. Yes. In our roadmap narrative, we incorrectly said that the 5 foot sidewalk and 12 planter would go on the East side. That was intended to say on the West side. So with the roadmap approvals, we don't have additional comments on the county's findings and conditions for those items. There were concerns about 25th Avenue, its width and the access that will be there in the short term during construction. And then in the long term, after construction

2:26:50 of these homes are completed, we will, you know, we're going to push to have our construction