Building_development

24:33 private parcel and so this is why I'm in front of you today is to have the council declare that this be changed the use to right away so that that extension of that road could be continued through to help support the subdivision. So in order for this to happen the tax parcel that was purchased in 2007 needs to be transformed from the raw land into right-of-way and as a result staff is requesting council to approve the resolution. Okay thank you are there any questions from council? Go ahead. Are we purchasing just the amount of right-of-way for the road or repurchasing the whole parcel? We purchased it in 2007 so it's part of it was part of the extension of the road and it didn't happen for you

25:30 know their projects develop and shrink and expand all the time and for this case we just have kind of an orphan sitting here so we purchased this in 2007. Okay and then just a you know question so the the Glenwood landing subdivision that's not yet built? That's correct. Okay so the developer as part of their plan need to dedicate 94th Avenue as right-of-way? No it well that's the job in front of me excuse me that's the job in front of you folks today is that we it is County owned property it's a chunk of land it's a full parcel of land in order for a road to get constructed on that we need to have it converted to right-of-way. Right but that's the word that's the parcel to the north I was curious I'm sorry all the interior all the interior roads that

26:26 are not there yet would be dedicated per the plat. Okay it just kind of brings up a kind of an odd point where you know the the first developer comes in here and they have to create that they have to dedicate that right away and just north of it you know that property is not developing in the county purchases the right way it's just an interesting thing about how the process works and kind of the first first developments that come in often end up kind of taking a brunt of some of that infrastructure but it doesn't have anything to do with approval I'm supportive of approving it just thought it was interesting to point out. It is interesting yes. Does 94th is that road exists continues to the not yet currently today it's just a it's an it looks like it's part of the ball failed honestly okay and so there's no railroad crossing that would need to

27:25 eventually there would need to be a railroad crossing yeah all right sure yes go ahead what are the positions of the adjacent landowners are they supportive and also a further question from the chair what plans have been made to extend the 94th south of the railroad I don't know hold on that's out of here okay you are in the room thanks for coming up sure good morning council Jeremy Provenzolo County engineer with respect to your question about the plans for 94th Avenue south of the railroad tracks or that crossing that would be privately financed so as development comes in south of the railroad tracks they would be conditioned to dedicate and build that connection but there's no

28:24 been no agreement from the landowners or any plans yet to do that so if they built it in the Glenwood Landing subdivision it would just end at the railroad tracks for now okay and what is there any position or is there support from the adjacent landowners for this decision today is there do you know what the positions of the adjacent landowners are I do not know what the positions of our adjacent landowners this request came from community development to public works to have this converted so this development could move forward for traffic circulation but as far as a discussion with property owners I've not had any and I'm unaware of whatever their positions may or may not be are they aware and have that you received any complaints I don't really know how to answer that but I do know that since it's a subdivision there will be a

29:23 public hearing and there will be plenty of time for the community to put their input for the public hearing process on that okay thank you any other questions from council chair just one quick comment this isn't for you guys this would be more for like community planning or community development but you know here we are look at all those houses that are being built right on the railroad line so I'm curious what you know you know we've got a we've got to start talking about railroad sometime soon and what the long-term plans are for it and looking at our code and seeing if the adjacent development is proper for what our long-term plans are with the railroad that's a very good point and the council won't be involved with the permitting of this development

30:21 and you're just narrowly asking for that segment today so is there further discussion or a motion that and this one there's a red it's a resolution is this a roll call or just okay but the resolution is 20 20 6 0 8 0 4 so moved