During a public hearing regarding a development project, the hearing examiner suspended live public testimony because the applicant introduced significant new site access and road modification plans at the last minute. Instead, an extended open record schedule was established to give county staff and residents adequate time to review the updated proposals. The public will have dedicated periods in September and October to submit written public comments on both the new plans and the subsequent staff evaluation.
Cross_cutting
Clark County Land Use Hearings · Aug 13, 2026 · 1:13:43–1:13:59 · Watch on CVTV ↗
Keywords: public comment public testimony Public hearing
What was said
1:12:42 that just came at the 11th hour here that is just very hard to comprehend. I just feel like we need to step back and just start all over at this point. - I think the applicant's lack of trust in local government does not give him the right to demand a rushed, unvetted, dual-track approval. The land needs to- - We're not doing that. Everyone mistrusts the government, so they're not alone in that, but also it's the access that we're talking about that has changed. - Well, the access is better off of Lakeshore and 119th, but I do, and just really oppose Northwest 118th Street because- - Right, right, right. You don't have your chance to talk about it. What your procedural request here,
1:13:40 'cause this is not gonna be decided tonight. In fact, I'm planning to not take public testimony tonight, but rather we're in kind of procedural land right now. So do you understand the difference between keeping the record open to allow the applicant to really crystallize what it is they're proposing and to make the additional road modification applications, get those in the door, get county staff to review and either comment or approve those or deny those, and understanding that you and all of your neighbors will have a chance to review the new submission, review the staff's response to those things, and kind of understand what is happening. It'll be a fully public process. I mean, you've seen how it's unfolded so far. It's been pretty public. You've seen how it's happened. So it'd be the same thing,
1:14:37 but with this new plan B or maybe plan C. - Can you tell me if plan B or C does approve what the 118th option is as a fallback safety net? - They haven't said that. It appears that they're dropping 118th
Evidence (1 match)
cross_cutting keyword 1:13:43–1:13:59 public comment, public testimony, Public hearing
h, but I do, and just really oppose Northwest 118th Street because- - Right, right, right. You don't have your chance to talk about it. What your procedural request here, 'cause this is not gonna be decided tonight. In fact, I'm planning to not take public testimony tonight, but rather we're in kind of procedural land right now. So do you understand the difference between keeping the record open to allow the applicant to really crystallize what it is they're proposing and to make the additional