Hunting

1:13:03 But really the planning exercise, I'll go back to our land use master plan update 2021, we looked at all sides of our city, north, south, east, west, for technical reasons I won't get into at this point, growing westward was the most feasible place to go, and that was particularly for job growth. Okay, and I guess I understand the aspect of wanting to expand in the purposes of job growth. It still comes back to me, I think, for us, looking at balancing budgets, working out details, you're giving what you think is less desirable area for your purposes, giving it back to the county, for the county to absorb it back into their budget, and have to deal

1:13:59 with the aspects of whatever growth is able to come towards it, regardless of Battleground's growth, it's going to be the growth that the county then permits and allows and pays for. Well, it's currently in the urban growth boundary, it's still Clark County's jurisdiction, it's still the county's, however, in terms of growing efficiently, urbanizing, and really a cost efficiency, not county versus city, but the most efficient way to grow, we believe, is not going south toward that meadow glade area, but where our existing infrastructure is, particularly the SR 502, now four-lane highway, which is a major investment, we find that that's where we want to put our investment, is where there's already existing significant

1:14:58 investment. On the north side of the highway only? Probably the north, some sections of the south side, we did avoid agriculturally designated areas along that corridor. >> All right, thank you. Commissioner Fadness. >> Yes, Commissioner Fadness, this is a question for the city, but Oliver, you might need to jump in as well. My understanding was that these amendments weren't included in the final EIS, these areas that you're asking for in the amendments. I just want to know how that would affect our process since I don't believe these were