Forests_green_space

1:59:37 to the emissions that we generate from powering our vehicles and our buildings and homes so when we're thinking about the green spaces and the canopy it's really not as much in a context really not as much with the goal of greenhouse gas reductions it's really more of a goal focus on climate resilience adding tree canopy is one of our it's one of our most effective strategies to help mitigate urban heat island effects and change the experience that our residents will have as summers continue to be hotter hotter and drier and try to make that lived experience for our residents you know comfortable as conditions continue on their current trends so it's it's really more of a community resilience focus in addition you know it's the public who who would not want another perk yeah so we

2:00:35 you have like i said it's not that i it's not that i don't support more trees and parks of course i do but i'm just wondering about that kind of the tracking under our calf program knowing that we have this reduction this pretty aggressive reduction emissions reduction goals and knowing too that again the tree doesn't show a lot of climate resilience benefits in that four to six year window either you know we're investing for that bigger future the 10-20 year future with that tree so just just to clarify for anyone maybe that doesn't help clarify for others but that's where i'm going with it is wondering if some of these that don't seem to be reducing that emissions as being top priorities of the calf staff's priority is still to achieve the goals that city council have set out it's very worth our time to understand

2:01:33 what the community prioritizes and try to find the nexus between those our urban forestry program already has its 28 canopy goal set and they will continue to work towards that if we're able to bring additional partners to the table or accelerate some of those efforts so much the better it doesn't mean that we it does not mean that we