Building_development

44:24 conscious choice they weren't in the context of they weren't in the context of making their land less valuable to them making their land less valuable to them what it does is it allows them what it does is it allows them the ability to get paid up front for them the ability to get paid up front for them to be able to do more with it to be able to do more with it so this is only for people this is for so this is only for people this is for only people that only people that want to agree to it though jack and i want to agree to it though jack and i think what you're doing is you're think what you're doing is you're saying you're making their decision for them saying you're making their decision for them by saying that the only way that by saying you're making their decision for them by saying that the only way that they can make money on that land in they can make money on that land in your estimation is if they decide to your estimation is if they decide to convert it convert it no you're and this is no you're and this is and what i'm talking about is the code and what i'm talking about is the code language specifically but what you just language specifically but what you just referred to referred to um of the the farmer permanently sold um of the the farmer permanently sold their development rights their development rights okay um that's exact but it was already okay um that's exact but it was already zoned ag zoned ag the land the farm was already nagged land the land the farm was already nagged land and what i'm saying is and what i'm saying is that that's exactly what the original that that's exactly what the original stuff that we passed stuff that we passed allowed to do that we go to that farmer allowed to do that we go to that farmer say hey you got this farm

45:23 say hey you got this farm we're going to purchase any future we're going to purchase any future development rights at the zoning chain development rights at the zoning chain this will permanently be ag um and then this will permanently be ag um and then here's here's um you know some financial here's here's um you know some financial consideration for that consideration for that what so so there was there wasn't in what so so there was there wasn't in in this case with a no net loss in this case with a no net loss it wouldn't apply okay because um it wouldn't apply okay because um because what what my understanding of because what what my understanding of the code language um um that allows the code language um um that allows alicia's proposed is alicia's proposed is we then have to go find land that is not we then have to go find land that is not currently zoned agriculture currently zoned agriculture purchase those development rights and purchase those development rights and turn it into agriculture turn it into agriculture and so and that's that's that's a concern i and so and that's that's that's a concern i have have which makes it financially infeasible and you won't which makes it financially infeasible and you won't the the program won't work so it's the the program won't work so it's the no net loss is what i have no net loss is what i have real concerns with some of the timeline real concerns with some of the timeline stuff i think i want to look at stuff i think i want to look at the whole clock on the the whole clock on the adoption and how quickly you know

46:22 adoption and how quickly you know it can be implemented but that's it can be implemented but that's um and that's why i like the original um and that's why i like the original language that we originally approved language that we originally approved any other discussions on it on this any other discussions on it on this commissioner leduc montgomery i think commissioner leduc montgomery i think there's another perspective which is