Regional Transportation Council

October 06, 2026 · 01:28:00 matched · Watch on CVTV ↗

No meeting summary yet — run council-monitor summarize.

Documents

Agenda

Slides / on-screen documents

Text read off slides, maps, and exhibits shown on screen — often never spoken aloud.

0:44 slide
RTC
October 6, 2026
RTC Board of Directors
Meeting
RTC
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
CVTV
1:28 slide
RTC
October 6, 2026
RTC Board of Directors
Meeting
RTC Staff
BALLARD STRATEGIES, LLC
Jim Ballard
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
CVTV
2:12 document
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FIC
Sue Marshall, Vice-Chair
CLARK COUNTY WASHINGTON
CVTV
BOARD OF DA
ARROWHEAD
2:56 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Public Comment
CVTV
3:40 slide
EBERLESTOCK EST. 1970 XXX -LET OUT THERE- October 6, 2026 Regional Transportation Council Meeting Public Comment CVTV
5:08 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Public Comment
CVTV
Public Comments
In Zoom, raise your hand to be recognized.
Wait until you are called by the Chair to speak.
If joining from a telephone enter *9 to be recognized.
Wait until you are called by the Chair to speak.
Select *6 to unmute to enable yourself to speak.
8:22 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Public Comment
CVTV
RTC
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Sue Marshall, Vice-Chair
BOARD OF D
8:48 slide
Action Items
IV. Consent Agenda
A. September 1, 2026 Minutes
B. October 2026 Claims
C. General Legal Counsel Services – Professional Services
Agreement Resolution 10-26-31
D. United States of America Federal Fiscal Year 2023–
2026 Transit Resolution 10-26-32
E. Personnel Policy Manual – Amendment Resolution 10-26-33
F. Procurement Policy – Amendment Resolution 10-26-34
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Consent Agenda
CVTV
9:32 document
Microphone Transportation Cart CVTV
11:00 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Consent Agenda
CVTV
Action Items
IV. Consent Agenda
A. September 1, 2026 Minutes
B. October 2026 Claims
C. General Legal Counsel Services - Professional Service Agreement Resolution 20-26-31
D. Updated Revenue Policy due to State Fiscal Year 2027 - 2028 Budget Resolution 20-26-32
E. Personnel Policy Manual - Amendment, Resolution 20-26-33
F. Procurement Policy - Amendment, Resolution 20-26-34
RIC
11:44 slide
Action Items
V. Consent Agenda
A. September 1, 2020 Minutes
B. October 2020 Claims
C. General Legal Counsel Services - Professional Services
Agreement Resolution 10-25-32
D. United States of America Waterways State fiscal year
2021-2022 Agreement Resolution 10-25-33
E. Personnel Policy Manual - Amendment to Drug Testing &
Pre-Employment Policy - Resolution 10-25-34
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Consent Agenda
CVTV
12:28 slide
Microphone
Transportation
Cart
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Consent Agenda
CVTV
13:03 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Consent Agenda
CVTV
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Sue Marshall, Vice-Chair
13:12 slide
Agenda Item V
2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program
ACTION
Amanda Grapes, AICP
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program
CVTV
13:56 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program
CVTV
14:40 slide
Agenda Item V
2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program
Action
Jennifer Campos, RTC
RTC
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program
15:24 slide
Transportation Improvement Program
Four-Year Program
Regionally Significant Projects
Financially Constrained
Federal Fund Obligation
RIC
10
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program
CVTV_
16:08 slide
Project Selection Process
Project Submission
RTC Project Review
Project Evaluation
Project Selection
Public Comment Period
Board TIP Adoption
Agencies Implement Projects
Public Input
RTC
11
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program
CVTV
16:52 slide
Transportation Improvement Program Adoption
Project Year
Program Amount
RTC Process
State STIP
2026 and 2027 projects can move forward for obligation
$701 billion total with $174 million in federal funds
Ensure Federal planning requirements are being met
Projects are added to State STIP for obligation
RTC
12
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program
CVTV
18:20 slide
Carbon Reduction Program 2027-2030 Allocations
Federal transportation bill reauthorizations have identified the elimination of the CRP so WSDOT is not allowing the programming of CRP in the STIP after this year
RTC has committed to funding any projects that have CRP funds programmed past 2026 and had to utilize CMAQ or STBG to backfill the CRP funds
This caused a need to reprogram some future projects in 2029 and 2030 to accommodate for the additional need of STBG projects
There is still the potential for project delays, utilizing Guidebook policies, or other factors that could still allow for projects to be programmed as originally identified in the grant award
RTC
13
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program
CVTV_
21:16 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program
Matt Kaufman
RTC Executive Director
CVTV
23:28 slide
Agenda Item VI
Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan
Adam Fiss, RTC
RTC
Adam Fiss
Senior Planner, Regional Transportation Council
24:12 slide
CPT-HSTP and Consolidated Grant Program
Biennial program for public transportation improvements
Managed by WSDOT and is responsible for distributing funds
Applicants must participate in MPO/RTPO planning process
RIC
17
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2026 Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan for Clark, Klickitat and Skamania Counties - Update
CVTV_
25:40 slide
Human Services Transportation Plan Overview
Human S...
For the
Clark, S...
Countie
2014 Human Services Transportation Plan
for Clark, Skamania and Klickitat Counties
2018 Human Services Transportation Plan
for Clark, Skamania and Klickitat Counties
2022 Coordinated Public Transit -
Human Services Transportation Plan
for Clark, Skamania and Klickitat Counties
Adopted: November 3, 2022
Southwest Washington
Regional Transportation Council
PO Box 1366, Vancouver, WA 98666-1366
Telephone: 360-397-6067
Relay Service: #711 or (800) 833-6388
www.rtc.wa.gov
DRAFT
2026 Coordinated Public
Transit - Human Services
Transportation Plan
Clark, Klickitat, and Skamania Counties
September 2026
Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council
PO Box 1366, Vancouver, WA 98666-1366
Telephone: 360-397-6067
Relay Service: #711 or (800) 833-6388
www.rtc.wa.gov
RTC
18
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2026 Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan for Clark, Klickitat and Skamania Counties - Update
CVTV_
26:24 slide
Human Services Transportation Plan Overview
Human Services Transportation Plan
for the Counties
Council
2014 Human Services Transportation Plan
for Clark, Skamania and Klickitat Counties
2018 Human Services Transportation Plan
for Clark, Skamania and Klickitat Counties
2022 Coordinated Public Transit -
Human Services Transportation Plan
for Clark, Skamania and Klickitat Counties
Adopted: November 3, 2022
Southwest Washington
Regional Transportation Council
DRAFT
2026 Coordinated Public
Transit - Human Services
Transportation Plan
Clark, Klickitat, and Skamania Counties
September 2026
Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council
RIC
PO Box 1366, Vancouver, WA 98666-1366
Telephone: 360.397.6067
Relay Service: #711 or (800) 833-6388
www.rtc.wa.gov
18
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2026 Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan for Clark, Klickitat and Skamania Counties – Update
27:08 slide
Human Services Transportation Plan Required Elements
Title VI and ADA Statements
Regional Context
Address Service Gaps
Contact Information
Community Engagement
Service Assessment
Regional Priorities
19
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2026 Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan for Clark, Klickitat and Skamania Counties – Update
CVTV_
33:00 slide
Transportation Needs Survey
English
and
Spanish
Online
and Hard
Copies
Available
June 15 -
July 31
Received
244
Responses
Gratitude for
existing
service and
providers
Requested
expansion of
service hours
Add and
expand
service
routes
Improve first
mile/last
mile
connections
RTC
20
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2026 Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan for Clark, Klickitat and
Skamania Counties - Update
CVTV_
35:12 slide
Process Timeline and Next Steps
RTAC and TPC recommendation in October
Board approval in November
Submit to WSDOT by December 1, 2026
Consolidated Grant Program regional rankings due January
30, 2027. Projects awarded in Summer.
Public Outreach
May - August 2026
Project Kickoff
February 2026
Release Draft
August 31, 2026
Plan Adoption
November 2026
Submit to WSDOT
December 1, 2026
RIC
21
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2026 Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan for Clark, Klickitat and
Skamania Counties - Update
CVTV_
35:56 slide
Process Timeline and Next Steps
RTAC and TPC recommendation in October
Board approval in November
Submit to WSDOT by December 1, 2026
Consolidated Grant Program regional rankings due January
30, 2027. Projects awarded in Summer.
Public Outreach
May - August 2026
Plan Adoption
November 2026
Submit to WSDOT
December 1, 2026
Project Kickoff
February 2026
Release Draft
August 31, 2026
RIC
21
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
2026 Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan for Clark, Klickitat and
Skamania Counties - Update
CVTV_
36:38 document
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Sue Marshall, Vice Chair CVTV
36:40 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Vancouver Area Smart Trek
CVTV
37:24 slide
Agenda Item VII.a
VANCOUVER AREA SMART TREK (VAST)
Dale Robins
RTC Planning Manager
RTC
38:08 slide
TSMO Core Strategies
Traffic Incident Management
Traffic Signal Coordination
Real Time Traveler Information
Managed Lanes
Road Weather Management
Freight Management
Transit Management
TSMO Core Strategies
RIC
23
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Vancouver Area Smart Trek
CVTV
38:52 slide
Why TSMO Plan?
Move from implementing stand-alone TSMO projects toward institutionalizing TSMO as a core function within an agency and the region
RIC
25
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Vancouver Area Smart Trek
CVTV
39:36 slide
TSMO Plan Near-Term Strategies
Executive Summary
Table 1: Near-Term TSMO Strategies Summary Table
TSMO Strategy
Priority
Duration¹
Level of Effort
Impact
Goal 1
(Safety & Ops)
Goal 2
(Fiber)
Goal 3
(Data)
Goal 4
(Innovation)
Goal 5
(Collaboration)
Goal 6
(Freight)
Goal 7
(TSMO
Integration)
Goal 8
(Workforce)
Develop a Fiber Renewal,
Resiliency, and Asset Plan
High
Long
High
High
•
•
Capture Knowledge from
Key VAST Personnel
High
Medium
High
High
•
Develop a VAST Charter
High
Short
Low
High
•
Create a TSMO Training
Ladder
High
Short
Low
High
•
Develop Regional ITS
Infrastructure Standards
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Develop an Operational
Safety ITS Plan
Low
Medium
High
Medium
•
Improve Performance
Management
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
•
•
Develop TSMO Story
for Maintenance and
Operations
Medium
Short
Low
Medium
•
Implement ATSPMs
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
•
Implement the JOG
and VCC
High
Long
High
High
•
•
Implement Ramp
Metering
High
Medium
Low
Medium
•
Develop a Regional Active
Transportation Plan
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
•
•
•
Implement Cloud-Based
Transit Signal Priority
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
•
•
Improve Signal Timing
High
Long
High
Medium
•
•
RIC
27
¹Short Duration: Less than one (1) year; Medium Duration: Between one (1) to two (2) years; Long Duration: Longer than two (2) years
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Vancouver Area Smart Trek
CVTV_
41:04 slide
TSMO Plan Near-Term Strategies
Executive Summary
Table 1: Near-Term TSMO Strategies Summary Table
TSMO Strategy | Priority | Duration¹ | Level of Effort | Impact | Goal 1 (Safety & Ops) | Goal 2 (Fiber) | Goal 3 (Data) | Goal 4 (Innovation) | Goal 5 (Collaboration) | Goal 6 (Freight) | Goal 7 (TSMO Integration) | Goal 8 (Workforce)
Develop a Fiber Renewal, Resiliency, and Asset Plan | High | Long | High | High | • | | | • | • | | |
Capture Knowledge from Key VAST Personnel | High | Medium | High | High | • | | | | • | | | •
Develop a VAST Charter | High | Short | Low | High | • | | | | • | | | •
Create a TSMO Training Ladder | High | Short | Low | High | • | | | | • | | | •
Develop Regional ITS Infrastructure Standards | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | • | • | • | • | • | | |
Develop an Operational Safety ITS Plan | Low | Medium | High | Medium | • | | • | | | | |
Improve Performance Management | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | • | | • | | • | | |
Develop TSMO Story for Maintenance and Operations | Medium | Short | Low | Medium | • | | | | • | | | •
Implement ATAPMs | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | • | • | • | • | • | • | • |
Implement the JOC and VCC | High | Long | High | High | • | | • | | • | • | • |
Implement Ramp Metering | High | Medium | Low | Medium | • | | • | | • | | |
Develop a Regional Active Transportation Plan | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | • | | • | | • | | |
Implement Cloud-Based Transit Signal Priority | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | • | | • | | • | | |
Improve Signal Timing | High | Long | High | Medium | • | | • | | • | | |
¹Short Duration: Less than one (1) year; Medium Duration: Between one (1) to two (2) years; Long Duration: Longer than two (2) years
27
RTC
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Vancouver Area Smart Trek
CVTV_
42:32 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Vancouver Area Smart Trek
CVTV
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Sue Marshall, Vice Chair
44:00 slide
VAST, by the Numbers
Fiber Permits
Total: 75
Active: 40
In Progress: 13
Retired: 22
157
Total Miles
of Fiber
Dedicated dark fiber lease costs
approximately $300 per fiber strand,
per mile, per month. Saving each
partner agency over $100,000 per
month over lease fiber cost.
8
Bistate Travel
Signs
in Washington
5
Miles of Active
Traffic
Management
(ATM: I-5, 78th
St. to SR 14)
25
Variable
Message
Signs
450
Traffic signals connected to
central signal system
(WSDOT, Clark County,
Vancouver, Camas,
Washougal, Battle Ground)
4.6
Miles of Bus
on Shoulder
(I-5, I-205,
SR 14)
17
Freeway
Ramp
Meters
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Vancouver Area Smart Trek
CVTV_
44:44 slide
Acknowledgments
"The most important factors for the success of the Program are agency partnerships, cooperative projects, staying active, and a shared vision for the future."
— Bob Hart, Retired RTC Staff
H EXIT 28
Mill Plain
Blvd
EXIT ONLY
TRAVEL TIME TO JCT 5 84
VIA 205 TO 84 1 MIN
VIA 14 TO 5 MIN
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Vancouver Area Smart Trek
CVTV_
45:28 slide
Partner Agencies
RTC thanks the following agencies who have participated in the VAST Program:
CITY OF
Vancouver
WASHINGTON
City of
Camas
WASHINGTON
CLARK COUNTY,
WASHINGTON
C-TRAN
Washington State
Department of Transportation
RTC
34
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Vancouver Area Smart Trek
CVTV_
46:12 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Vancouver Area Smart Trek
DIRECTORS
Matt Ransom
RTC Executive Director
CVTV
50:36 slide
October 6, 2026 Regional Transportation Council Meeting Vancouver Area Smart Trek CVTV Matt Ranson RTC Executive Director
51:40 document
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
CVTV
52:04 slide
Agenda Item VIII
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region - Draft
CVTV
52:48 slide
Why This Work Matters?
The plan establishes a consistent regional approach for identifying transportation risks, comparing priority corridors, and carrying resilience considerations into future planning and investment decisions.
What's included in the Plan:
Countywide assessment of hazards and transportation system risk
Priority corridors for resilience investments
Implementation actions, strategies, and performance measures
Information to support future RTP and investment decisions
RIC
Resiliency Assessment Plan
Clark County Region
August 2026
36
RIC
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region - Draft
CVTV_
54:16 slide
Stakeholder Engagement
Three stages of stakeholder engagement:
1
Regional Emergency Transportation Route Development
Collected stakeholder input to refine route tiers/prioritization and identified additional routes.
2
Risk Assessment Method
Collected stakeholder input to refine the risk assessment process, scoring factors, and factor weighting.
3
Results and Implementation
Reviewed updated risk results, performance measures, and implementation strategies. Input informed Plan.
RIC
37
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan – Clark County Region – Draft
CVTV_
55:44 slide
What is a Regional Emergency Transportation Routes?
Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council
Regional Emergency Transportation Routes
A designated system of priority roadways for rapid damage assessment and debris clearance following a major emergency or natural disaster.
• The network builds on Metro/ RDPO RETR methodology for the 5-county area.
• RTC, Clark County, CRESA, and local jurisdictions provided technical input to refine priorities and add routes based on local emergency access and critical infrastructure needs.
Route Prioritization
1st Tier
State Route, State Route, etc. Existing
2nd Tier
3rd Tier
3rd Tier - Proposed New Connection
38
KITTELSON
& ASSOCIATES
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region - Draft
CVTV_
57:12 slide
Risk Assessment Process – Process Overview
How do we identify where the biggest resilience challenges are?
1
Collect Data
Natural hazards
Critical infrastructure
Transportation assets
and condition
2
Conduct GIS
Analysis
Assign data to RETR
corridor segments
3
Calculate Risk
Scores
Score and weight
vulnerability and
criticality factors
4
Prioritize
Corridors
Group segments into
corridors and
compare total risk.
Vulnerability x Criticality = Total Risk
RIC
39
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan – Clark County Region – Draft
CVTV
58:40 slide
Risk Assessment and Scoring
Vulnerability
How likely is it to be impacted?
Vulnerability refers to the susceptibility of a transportation asset or corridor to damage or operational disruption when exposed to a hazard.
Factors
Hazard exposure data (flood, landslide, earthquake, volcano, wildfire)
Roadway asset characteristics; and,
Clark County bridge condition data.
Note: State routes were not analyzed because WSDOT is completing a separate assessment through its Transportation Resilience Improvement Plan (TRIP).
Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council
Total Vulnerability Score
Figure 1
LA CENTER
YACOLT
RIDGEFIELD
BATTLE GROUND
VANCOUVER
CAMAS
WASHOUGAL
0 Miles
KITTELSON
& ASSOCIATES
Vulnerability Score
High Vulnerability (1.6-2.6)
Medium Vulnerability (1.1-1.6)
Low Vulnerability (0.7-1.1)
State Priority Routes
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region - Draft
CVTV_
AIC
59:24 slide
Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council
Risk Assessment and Scoring
Total Vulnerability Score
Figure 1
Vulnerability
How likely is it to be impacted?
Vulnerability refers to the susceptibility of a
transportation asset or corridor to damage or
operational disruption when exposed to a
hazard.
Factors
Hazard exposure data (flood, landslide,
earthquake, volcano, wildfire)
Roadway asset characteristics; and,
Clark County bridge condition data.
LA CENTER
RIDGEFIELD
VANCOUVER
CAMAS
WASHOUGAL
Note: State routes were not analyzed because WSDOT is completing
a separate assessment through its Transportation Resilience
Improvement Plan (TRIP).
AIC
Vulnerability Score
High Vulnerability (1.6-2.6)
Medium Vulnerability (1.1-1.6)
Low Vulnerability (0.7-1.1)
State Priority Routes
Miles
0
KITTELSON
& ASSOCIATES
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region - Draft
CVTV_
1:00:08 slide
Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council
Risk Assessment and Scoring
Total Criticality Score
Figure 2
Criticality
How important is it?
Criticality refers to the importance of a transportation asset or corridor to maintaining overall transportation system function.
Factors
Regional Emergency Transportation Routes (RETRs)
Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT),
Route redundancy analysis; and,
Stakeholder input
RIC
LA CENTER
RIDGEFIELD
VANCOUVER
CAMAS
WASHOUGAL
Criticality Score
High Criticality (1.9-2.5)
Medium Criticality (1.4-1.9)
Low Criticality (0.9-1.4)
State Priority Routes
5 Miles
KITTELSON
& ASSOCIATES
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region - Draft
CVTV_
1:00:52 slide
Assessment Results - Route Prioritization
Where should we focus our attention and investment?
Highest Scoring Routes:
1. Washougal River Road
2. Rock Creek/152nd/Lucia Falls Rd
3. Pioneer Street
4. NE 192nd Avenue
5. NE Highway 99
6. SE Blair Road
7. NW Lake Road
8. NW La Center Road
9. NE 82nd Avenue
10. NW 78th Street
Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council
RETRs - Total Risk
Figure 4
Total Risk Score
High Risk (2.5-3.0)
Medium Risk (1.5-2.0)
Low Risk (0.7-1.0)
State Priority Routes
KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES
RIC
42
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region - Draft
CVTV_
1:01:36 slide
Assessment Results – Route Prioritization
Where should we focus our attention and investment?
Highest Scoring Routes:
1. Washougal River Road
2. Rock Creek/152nd/Lucia Falls Rd
3. Pioneer Street
4. NE 192nd Avenue
5. NE Highway 99
6. SE Blair Road
7. NW Lake Road
8. NW La Center Road
9. NE 82nd Avenue
10. NW 78th Street
Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council
RETRs - Total Risk
Figure 4
LA CENTER
RIDGEFIELD
BATTLE GROUND
AMBOY
YACOLT
BRUSH PRAIRIE
CAMAS
WASHOUGAL
VANCOUVER
Total Risk Score
High Risk (2.3-3.0)
Medium Risk (1.3-2.2)
Low Risk (0.7-1.2)
State Priority Routes
5 Miles
10 KM
KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES
AIC
42
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan – Clark County Region – Draft
CVTV_
1:03:04 slide
Plan Recommendations – What do we do about it?
The following categories summarize the more detailed recommendations included in the Plan.
Risk Assessment Results
Inform RTP updates and project prioritization
Support screening of high-risk corridors during planning and project development
Help pair resilience improvements with preservation and capital projects
Implementation Actions
Update hazard, asset, and risk data as conditions change
Continue coordination with local agencies, CRESA, C-TRAN, WSDOT, utilities, and Metro
Evaluate corridor-specific strategies with local jurisdictions
Performance Measures
Adding practical resilience measures to RTC performance monitoring
Measures help track asset condition, redundancy, connectivity, implementation, and alignment with goals
RTC
43
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region - Draft
CVTV_
1:04:32 slide
Other Business
IX. Other Business
A. From the Board
B. From the Executive Director
* Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Report
* 2024 C-TRAN General Obligation Bond Ballot Measure
* FY 2024 C-TRAN
* Next RTC Board Meeting: Tuesday November
* Adjourn
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region - Draft
CVTV
1:05:16 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region - Draft
RTC JUDITH PIERCE
CVTV_
1:06:44 slide
Please Sign In
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan - Clark County Region - Draft
CVTV
1:07:28 slide
Judith Perez Keniston
Principal Planner, Regional Transportation Council
RTO
JUDITH PEREZ
CVTV
1:08:12 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Resiliency Assessment Plan – Clark County Region – Draft
BOARD OF DIRECT
Mat Ransom
utive Direc
CVTV
1:08:56 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Other Business - From the Board
CVTV
1:09:40 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Other Business - From the Executive Director
CVTV
1:10:24 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Other Business - From the Executive Director
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RTC Executive Director
CVTV
1:11:08 slide
Other Business
IX Other Business
update on upcoming projects
Transportation Council Meeting
1:00 PM
From the Executive Director
X Adjourn
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Other Business – From the Executive Director
CVTV
1:11:52 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Other Business – From the Executive Director
RTC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
CVTV
1:12:36 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Other Business - From the Executive Director
RTC Executive Director
CVTV
1:14:04 document
SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE
2023 Policy Statement
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Other Business – From the Executive Director
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RTC Executive Director
CVTV
1:18:28 slide
October 6, 2026
Regional Transportation Council Meeting
Other Business - From the Executive Director
CVTV
Matt Ransom
RTC Executive Director
Full Transcript (695 words)

0:00 Good afternoon and welcome. Calling to order the Regional Transportation Council, October 6, 2026. Let's start with the roll call. Michelle Belcott. Present. Sue Marshall. Here. Will Fuentes. Ann McInerney-Ogle. Present. Eric Paulson. Here. Mafsa Eshki. Here. Troy McCoy. Here. Issa Leckie. Present. Ron Eyrig. Here.

0:58 Randy Parker. Here. Michael Southwick. Here. Larry Keister. Here. Dean Reynolds. Here. Ryan Windsheimer. Here. Christine Lewis.

1:27 And House and Senate members of the 14th, 17th, 18th, 20th, and 49th districts. Okay, thank you. Are there any amendments to the agenda? And if not, I'll entertain a motion to approve the agenda. Move to approve the agenda as presented. Paulson? Second. McInerney, moved. Moved. And seconded. Thank you. All those in favor, say aye. Aye. Okay. Thank you very much. Then moving on to public comments, we have a couple people who have signed up in the room. And just a reminder to limit your comments to three minutes. So we'll start with Bruce Barnes.

2:27 Bruce Barnes: Good afternoon, Chair, and Board of Directors here. My name is Bruce Barnes, for the record. I want to talk about a few things today. One, I'd like to ask that Wil Fuentes recuse himself from this committee because he's violated the county charter. With him being in charge of the Fourth Plain Ford and also taking money from our county taxpayers, it's a violation of the county charter. And I don't think he should be in any position to be making any recommendations or anything on any board until that is resolved. Secondly, I want to talk about Highway 504. It's been four years since the road washed out at Mount St. Helens. We used to have about 1.3 million visitors up there, and now there's about 130,000. And it's taken people's recreation away, especially mine and other people I know that like to go up and hunt.

3:26 We've been recreating mountain bike and everything else up there. And not only that, but the businesses have severely suffered up there. When you look at the businesses that have gone out of business on Highway 504, it's a huge effect on a rural community. Secondly, I want to talk about Highway 14 and the shape that that highway's in. It is destroyed, and it's extremely dangerous. I watched a Porsche crash there three weeks ago. Injury, accident. The road is just so rough. The other thing I'd like to talk about is the interstate bridge. I don't know if you guys have talked to any of the bicycle associations about putting a toll on the bicycles going across the new interstate bridge. I'm sure you're going to have some huge backlash for bicyclists crossing the bridge and being charged a toll fee. I don't know how much more money people can pay. They're absorbed already.

4:25 I don't know how much more money they're going to pay if they don't pay taxes, fuel taxes, food. I mean, at what point are we giving up 90% of our income to build things that most people don't want? So, I don't know. I just think that we need to improve our roadways first and foremost and make them safer. And I guess that's all I've got for today. Thanks so much. Thank you. Next up is Carmen De Leon. Hello. So, where's my timer? Oh, there you go. Okay. So, I'm Carmen De Leon, also known as Mellow, and I think I've gone over the prices with you already. They claim to have secured $2 billion for the bridge, and according to my little study here, the Fremont Bridge in today's money was $600 million.

5:25 Would be $600 million. The 205 Bridge, again $600 million. Ross Island Bridge, about $40 million. I-5 Bridge, $13 billion. So, you know, what is wrong with the math here? You can make three other bridges for a quarter of the amount of money, and yet they want to push this billion-dollar -- doesn't need to be done because we've had four now engineers say that that bridge is sound. It does not need to be demolished. So, what do you think about that?

5:35 I think it's a good idea.