← Discussions

Building_development

Clark County Land Use Hearings · May 28, 2026 · 44:46–44:58 · Watch on CVTV ↗

The proposed Auslan Acres Subdivision seeks to divide 8.78 acres into 98 single-family attached townhome lots within an R16 zone. The discussion focused heavily on development impacts and infrastructure mitigation, specifically the coordinated installation of a new traffic signal at 88th Street and 94th Avenue, road extensions, and archaeological survey conditions. Additional public and applicant discussions addressed the adequacy of geotechnical soil testing near an existing wastewater pump station and the project's potential impact on local school capacity.

Keywords: plat concurrency Subdivision infrastructure zoning density subdivision

What was said

43:46 prior to construction plan approval. I would recommend that that just says removed prior to construction and strike plan approval. - Okay. And those were the only staff report edits that we noticed and would like to put on the record. And we covered the DAP comments, and I think staff has done well talking about the other items that have come up with this project. You know, the revised site plan. I feel that this is a better layout than connecting to 93rd Street and should help keep a little more traffic away from 94th Avenue. The traffic signal going in at 94th Avenue and 88th Street is nearing its completion with reviews with Clark County, and so it's ahead of us. And so should be approved, I think, before construction plans are approved for this project. And so we're fine with the voluntary, you know,

44:43 making sure that that signal is installed, you know, prior to our final plat. And I think that should definitely help alleviate some of the traffic congestion in this area. As part of our mitigation traffic recommendations, I think they're going to adjust some of the timing of the traffic light that is down at Patton Parkway and 94th Avenue. And by increasing some timing there, that should help also relieve some of this congestion between the two. - That's not a subject of any conditions on your project? - Not specifically, no. It was more discussions between our traffic engineer and the city and the county on designing of this signal and function of this corridor. So that was just the other piece that should hopefully help alleviate, you know, some of the traffic flow in this area. - Okay, okay. And there were an abundant number of public comments. A lot of them dealt with traffic. They were not terribly specific,

45:43 so it's hard really to pin a particular intersection on those comments. And is your read of those comments any other intersection or street segment implicated?


Evidence (1 match)

direct keyword 44:46–44:58 plat, concurrency, Subdivision, infrastructure, zoning, density, subdivision
ark County, and so it's ahead of us. And so should be approved, I think, before construction plans are approved for this project. And so we're fine with the voluntary, you know, making sure that that signal is installed, you know, prior to our final plat. And I think that should definitely help alleviate some of the traffic congestion in this area. As part of our mitigation traffic recommendations, I think they're going to adjust some of the timing of the traffic light that is down at Patton Par

Full match → · CVTV ↗