During public testimony, nearby residents raised concerns about a proposed 98-unit townhome development, specifically highlighting issues with increased traffic congestion, school capacity, and soil liquefaction risks near a wastewater pump station. The applicant’s engineers and county staff addressed these public comments by detailing traffic study results, code compliance, and planned infrastructure improvements such as a new traffic signal. To ensure all neighborhood concerns are considered, the hearing examiner established a one-week open record period for the submission of any further written public comments before rendering a final decision.
Cross_cutting
Clark County Land Use Hearings · May 28, 2026 · 1:02:42–1:02:55 · Watch on CVTV ↗
Keywords: public testimony public comment
What was said
1:01:41 that is of this question, then what measures are there to protect the public from the development? - Well, there may be measures, but they're not anything that I administer. I'm a creature of code. My authority is limited by what the code allows and that's not among them. - Sure. And I'll add grace to that and that's a fair comment there. I guess other than that, then, you know, our biggest concern, you know, we're just introducing that to the people that are here for the hearing. However, the geological hazards though, based upon, you know, 40.430, I just wanna add that the county has also tried to address that it's mapped as class C, but the title 40 code under 40.430 also states that where the maps and the definitions conflict, the definitions shall prevail. And so we have a geotechnical report that has not been submitted to the county because the wastewater district suppressed that report
1:02:41 from going to the county. And I believe I have provided that in my public testimony so that you have record of what the seismic conditions are. And I'm not sitting here saying that we want to have this project closed down, but we just want to be provided proper assurances because it's also not fair to the public to have 98 homeowners come in and buy something that they think is on stable ground when it's not. - Fair enough. Okay, we'll see what the applicant says. - All right, thank you. - Okay, thank you. Who else out there wishes to testify in opposition? Raise your hand. - Let's see. Right now I'm not seeing any more. Let's give it one more second. Oh, there we go. Alison Ward. Alison, you should be able to unmute yourself now.
1:03:43 (whispering) - I apologize, can you hear me now? - Yes, go ahead. Introduce yourself first, please, for the record. - Yeah, Alison Ward, and I live just down the road off 80th Street at 8104 Northeast 94th Street.
Evidence (1 match)
cross_cutting keyword 1:02:42–1:02:55 public testimony, public comment
nitions conflict, the definitions shall prevail. And so we have a geotechnical report that has not been submitted to the county because the wastewater district suppressed that report from going to the county. And I believe I have provided that in my public testimony so that you have record of what the seismic conditions are. And I'm not sitting here saying that we want to have this project closed down, but we just want to be provided proper assurances because it's also not fair to the public to